Published · Austria
GDPRHigh severityEnforcement action
Federal Administrative Court orders ORF to redesign cookie banner
Austria's Federal Administrative Court upheld a data‑protection authority ruling that ORF.at must give its “Accept” and “Reject” cookie buttons equal visual prominence.
1 source · Austrian Data Protection Authority
What happened
- The court confirmed that ORF’s cookie banner violates the GDPR by highlighting the “Accept” button in colour, creating misleading consent.
- The 2024 decision of the Austrian Data Protection Authority required equal prominence for both options, and the court rejected ORF’s appeal.
- The ruling signals that similar dark‑pattern banners across the EU will face the same scrutiny.
Why it matters
Other publishers with cookie banners that favour consent will need to audit button design and ensure parity, or risk comparable court orders.
Business impact
Web teams must adjust UI styles and possibly update consent‑management platforms to meet the equal‑prominence requirement, affecting rollout timelines and testing cycles.
Drafted automatically from the sources below. How we write summaries
Does this summary seem wrong?What to check
audit cookie banner UIHigh priority
Check that “Accept” and “Reject” buttons have identical colour, size, and placement prominence.
update banner designHigh priority
Redesign any banner where the consent option is visually dominant to meet GDPR parity standards.
Discussion
No comments yet. Start the discussion.