Skip to content

Published · Austria

GDPRHigh severityEnforcement action

Federal Administrative Court orders ORF to redesign cookie banner

Austria's Federal Administrative Court upheld a data‑protection authority ruling that ORF.at must give its “Accept” and “Reject” cookie buttons equal visual prominence.

1 source · Austrian Data Protection Authority

What happened

  • The court confirmed that ORF’s cookie banner violates the GDPR by highlighting the “Accept” button in colour, creating misleading consent.
  • The 2024 decision of the Austrian Data Protection Authority required equal prominence for both options, and the court rejected ORF’s appeal.
  • The ruling signals that similar dark‑pattern banners across the EU will face the same scrutiny.

Why it matters

Other publishers with cookie banners that favour consent will need to audit button design and ensure parity, or risk comparable court orders.

Business impact

Web teams must adjust UI styles and possibly update consent‑management platforms to meet the equal‑prominence requirement, affecting rollout timelines and testing cycles.

Drafted automatically from the sources below. How we write summaries

Does this summary seem wrong?

What to check

  1. audit cookie banner UIHigh priority

    Check that “Accept” and “Reject” buttons have identical colour, size, and placement prominence.

  2. update banner designHigh priority

    Redesign any banner where the consent option is visually dominant to meet GDPR parity standards.

Discussion

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Free account required